MSOC Forums

Go Back   MSOC Forums > Technical > Engine Tuning
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Engine Tuning All technical chat regarding the 2JZ

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2004, 09:52 AM   #11
tlicense
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Witney, Oxford, UK
Posts: 41
Default

psi at the moment but it's possible to change that to kpa or any other unit for that matter.

As you said it's simply a linear voltage thing, so as long as the calibrated value that corresponds to a certain pressure is the same (ie 1 bar calibrated before = 1 bar afterward) then I really shouldn't be having a problem should I?

I really do think it's a wrong part issue, as I've meticulously followed the AEM how to change your map sensor guide and it's just not working for me. I may well need to go and buy a pressure gauge and hand pump and calibrate this sensor myself.

Cheers

Tony
__________________
Tony License
'93 JDM GZ Auto <-- Soon to be 6 spd
Razo Turbo Timer
HKS Exhaust and mid pipe
18\" Mille Miglia HT3
tlicense is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2004, 11:35 AM   #12
eyefi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: w yorkshire
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (tlicense @ Sep. 03 2004,10:52)]As you said it's simply a linear voltage thing, so as long as the calibrated value that corresponds to a certain pressure is the same (ie 1 bar calibrated before = 1 bar afterward) then I really shouldn't be having a problem should I?
exactly fella.

ive made a voltage vs pressure table for one with a boost gauge, volt meter and a syringe. make sure u get it right though, id much rather use the factory table.
eyefi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2004, 05:14 PM   #13
tlicense
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Witney, Oxford, UK
Posts: 41
Default

These pressure sensors are linear right? I'm getting 1.73 Volts at 0 Kpa Gauge and 4.5 Volts at 250 Kpa. From this I can create a straight line graph which I can then use to create a calibration for this sensor yeah?
__________________
Tony License
'93 JDM GZ Auto <-- Soon to be 6 spd
Razo Turbo Timer
HKS Exhaust and mid pipe
18\" Mille Miglia HT3
tlicense is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2004, 05:43 PM   #14
eyefi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: w yorkshire
Posts: 85
Default

i wouldnt assume anything it could well b a curve.

what's the table like that is loaded by the wizard?

thinking about the part number, why would the same sensor have a different part number?
eyefi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2004, 08:13 PM   #15
tlicense
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Witney, Oxford, UK
Posts: 41
Default

Have managed to sort this.

Basically the stock MAP sensor had been set-up incorrectly when the AEM was originally installed. The min voltage was 1.00 V instead of 1.09 v. What this meant was when I was switching to the 3.5 bar map the map had a .1 volts offset. This meant that the load scale was effectively 0.1 volts worth of load off.

I modified the 3.5 BAR sensor calibration by the 0.1 volts and everything cleared up. The AFR went to exactly what it was beforehand.

So effectively I've moved the loadscale up by 0.1 volts but what I really need to do is move all the maps down by 0.1 volts, as currently the sensor is 0.1 volts above atmospheric when the car is at idle (about 1.2 psi IIRC)

Thanks for your hepl eyefi.

Oh yes almost forgot. Apparently all pressure sensors used in the automotive industry (Well all the honda/nissan/GM/Toyota and AEM ones) are linear.

I also found out about the part numbers (via a phone call to AEM in cali) 30-2112 is the part number of the kit (sensor and lead) whereas 35-2112 is the part number of the sensor itself.

Cheers

Tony
__________________
Tony License
'93 JDM GZ Auto <-- Soon to be 6 spd
Razo Turbo Timer
HKS Exhaust and mid pipe
18\" Mille Miglia HT3
tlicense is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2004, 10:11 PM   #16
Martin F
Administrator
 
Martin F's Avatar
 
UK Spec - Manual
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 10,226
Send a message via MSN to Martin F
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Quote[/b] (tlicense @ Sep. 03 2004,21:13)]This meant that the load scale was effectively 0.1 volts worth of load off.
That would kind of make sense. Also i'd say its a good indicator to anybody attempting to map their own car with very little knowledge how such a small thing can cause such a big problem.

Good that AEM are so supportive as well.
__________________
Martin

UK6TT + Bits & Bobs

'Remember folks, the inside lane isn't just for Xmas'




MSOC FAQ MSOC Members Discounts MSOC Resources
Martin F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2004, 08:22 AM   #17
tlicense
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Witney, Oxford, UK
Posts: 41
Default

Totally agree with you Martin.

The thing I'm finding very difficult at the moment is that my car has effectively been mapped by about 3 different people.

If I had created a completely new map all by myself I wouldn't have run into this problem.

Never mind we'll get there in the end!
__________________
Tony License
'93 JDM GZ Auto <-- Soon to be 6 spd
Razo Turbo Timer
HKS Exhaust and mid pipe
18\" Mille Miglia HT3
tlicense is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aem ecu questions tlicense Engine Tuning 17 16th October 2003 12:32 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2003 - 2017, MSOC